I've been busy doing other things - okay, and
procrastinating - and I may not get this challenge finished. I've really fallen down on taking photos during the process. Too bad, can't be changed now! I looked really bad and pretty miserable in the photos I took for the PR Sewing Bee because of pain from a dry socket, funny name. It's getting a bit better, less painful with antibiotics and painkillers but I still don't feel at all photogenic - then I never am! I'll take photos of the pattern pieces tomorrow in the daylight.
I've found fitting much more difficult than I anticipated
(as predicated by Kate). I did take it to my sewing bee a few weeks ago to get
an opinion but unfortunately, I haven't had it back since - and I don't have
any more sewing bees left before the dress is due in.
I didn't like the photograph on the envelope of the plus size pattern I am using.
I don't think the dress fits the model. Or maybe this
style of dress isn't suitable for a plus size person? The line drawings look
great and the photo on the regular sized envelope looks good as far as I can
see. I am extremely wary about the dress's suitability for my figure.
This is the pattern envelope from the smaller size range |
I rather like the line drawings. It's the same pieces whether a sleeve is added or not |
I was pretty good and read all the instructions before I
changed things!
My pattern is sizes 20W - 28W+. By high bust measurement, I fit
into the size 20W, although I often use a size 18 if I am making from the smaller size range, even if there is a 20 available. I am quite wide shouldered. There isn't much difference
between my high bust and my full bust - only 2" - which means that I
should fit into the regular cup size in regular patterns and here. I know I
don't, though. My bra size is 36DD. The suggestion from the pattern was that I
cut the 20 cup size C (based on difference between full bust and high bust in
the plus size range) - I decided to go for the D, not the DD which was also an
option. The instructions do point out that you have to consider your body shape
when making your choices.The cup sizes refer to the front only.
The back pattern pieces come in slim, average and curvy. My hips measure at two sizes above the pattern piece given measurements, which means that I am a 'curvy' person and so used the curvy fit pieces. I've only once before used an Amazing Fit pattern (a skirt) and found the curvy hip pieces too curvy but I did as recommended.
The back pattern pieces come in slim, average and curvy. My hips measure at two sizes above the pattern piece given measurements, which means that I am a 'curvy' person and so used the curvy fit pieces. I've only once before used an Amazing Fit pattern (a skirt) and found the curvy hip pieces too curvy but I did as recommended.
Okay then. I started to trace the pattern pieces but
realised I really didn't have enough time so have cut directly into and altered
the pattern tissue. Terrible!
The next instruction is to lengthen the pattern pieces as
necessary. I had big problems here. I needed to lengthen the shoulder to bust
point by 2.25". I've been reading Joi Mahon's 'Create the Perfect Fit' and
tried her methods.
Front
I cut across the upper side front pattern piece and added in
the required amount - 2.25" By Joi's method, this adds a lot of depth to
the armscye. The Palmer Pletsch method would cut out a box and slide down
keeping everything properly aligned. This method does not alter the armhole
depth. However, because I am longer from my shoulder to the armscye (I'm
5'11" not 5'6" which is what patterns are designed for) I do actually
need to drop the armscye anyway. So I went with Joi's method and waited until
later to build the armscye back up to an appropriate place.
Raised and altered armscye on upper side front |
Here you can see the lengthening affecting the armscye, the altered armscye and the area above the bust point |
Because I have lengthened by quite a bit - this of course is
the same alteration used to lower the bust point, though my bust point is not
disproportionately low, or just a little as I get older - the upper chest line
is rather distorted. I was going to follow the Palmer Pletsch method to draw
the curve but in the end, didn't at that stage as at the sewing bee Dan said I
could take that in later if required - extra fabric would be added which could
easily be removed later. Easier to take fabric away than add it!
The purple line is the line that I would have cut following the PP method. I went with the cut area in the meantime. Quite a difference! |
The alteration the way I did it, following Joi's method,
lowers the whole of the dress below the cut and also brings the waistline into
a more reasonable position. The Palmer Pletsch method actually reduces the
distance from bust point to waist. I am also long bust to waist. More of my
extra length is in my torso rather than my legs. My front waistline is rather
lower than the back.
I also had to alter the front and side front to match.
Originally, I also lengthened a little below the waist to
add to the skirt length. Not by much at the front. The length back and front
does not match.
Back
By Joi's method, I worked out where my 'full back' was and
lengthened the upper part of the back to suit. However, in this case, I had to
raise the waistline point by a little, to get it falling in the correct place.
All back pieces were altered similarly.
However, the waist points need to match at the side seam. I
looked at the upper side panels. Now the front panel was considerably longer
than the back. I decided I liked the length of the longer one better. I
therefore lengthened the back upper side panel. This meant also altering the
curve into which it fitted.
Altered side back curve. I had to add to side seam as I had tapered to larger size at hips too late, I thought |
Armscyes
I adjusted the armscyes to match front and back. This meant
raising the front armscye quite a bit. I think the armscye in the original pattern
was a little low for me - I don't want to be showing the side of my bra! This
pattern has the same basic armhole shape whether or not you are making the sleeveless
version, as I am, or the version with sleeves.
Princess seam lines
In my sewing bee I had discussed the princess seam lines.
Now I love princess seams - they are great for fitting and I think the long
lines are fairly slimming.
However, in this case I disliked the shaping of the front
seams and discussed this with Dan. They flared out much too much for my liking.
I pinned the tissue pieces together to try to judge fit and how they would lie.
When I pinned the front tissue piece to the side front tissue piece, it
appeared as if there was no shaping whatsoever. This seemed very strange at
that position but was not so surprising on another level as there didn't appear
to be much bustline shaping on the model, judging by the photo. Dan suggested
pinning these two pattern pieces together, cutting as one when I made the toile
and later deciding on the princess design line as that is what it appeared to
be, rather than a true princess seam with integral shaping.
Surprisingly, there was quite a bit of shaping included in the
rear princess seam and the same option was not available. These were going to
be cut as per pattern. I was a little concerned that the dress would look
rather odd, being so different front to back, but was reassured that this would
be fine. I was also a little worried about altering the front by too much so
that it didn't resemble the original pattern at all.
Tissue Fitting
First toile/muslin
I went ahead with my first toile, using plain calico.
As recommended by the Amazing Fit pattern instructions, I
used 1" seam allowances on all side seams and 5/8" seam allowances
elsewhere - in other words, as per pattern.
I found that there was actually some shaping built into the
front/side front pattern pieces so decided to cut them separately. They didn't
lie as smoothly as it seemed they had originally.
I don't have a photo of me wearing this first toile. Apart
from length changes, this is pretty much as per pattern.
The fit wasn't too bad. Certainly better than I thought it
was going to be.
I did make a number of changes to the pattern following
this:
- I really didn't like where the front princess seam was lying and got David to draw in a more pleasing, for me, line.
- I felt the skirt was too flared for my liking and I decided I wanted it slimmed down a little - not to a straight skirt as this would perhaps take too much away from the original design concept.
- The front length was too long by quite a bit so I took away the length I had added to the pattern and more - I had to tuck up on a shorten line which I had to draw. Again I had to do this on all pattern pieces. I didn't change the back length at this stage.
As I realised that I was going to make quite major changes
to the pattern following this, I didn't go too far with fit and just made the above
changes to the pattern with a view to making another toile.
Pattern changes
This almost all was on the front pieces.
- I moved the princess seam on the front closer to the centre below the upper side panel. This meant that I had to take away from the centre front and add to the side front at their junction. I still had to keep a smooth line.
- I took in a little at the hem of the sides (front and back) and tapered back to zero at the top of that piece (which joined to upper side front). I didn't take in as much as we had measured as I reckoned I would be better altering to suit later.
Second (and final) toile
It sounds like my sort of frock with all the fitting you're doing. I bet it's going to be soo worth it. Good luck ��
ReplyDeleteMmm, not so sure I'm up for this! I need your luck, thanks. Only have a day now and waaay behind, I don't think I'll get it done, for this at least.
DeleteGood luck! I do like the photo on the pattern -- I do not like the piping in white but nonetheless the dress lines are very pretty.
ReplyDeleteThank you. My original plan was royal blue/cobalt crepe dress with black piping. I don't like the white, either. As I'm such a pear shape, I find that degree of A-line shape emphasises that, which is why I reduced that.
Delete